Gymshark vs Under Armour
Gymshark vs Under Armour, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Gymshark is on 66/100 and Under Armour on 24/100.
Where each one leads
Gymshark
- our overall score: 66/100 against 24/100
Under Armour
- funding raised: $815M against $261M
At a glance
| Measure | Gymshark | Under Armour |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global fitness apparel and accessories brand known for its strong social media presence and community focus. | Global innovator in sportswear, footwear, and accessories, empowering athletes through performance-driven apparel. |
| Category | Retail, Fitness Apparel, Athleisure, E-commerce | Sports Apparel, Footwear, Athletic Gear, Performance Wear |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2C |
| Offering | E-commerce | Software | hardware | services | marketplace | platform |
| Founded | 2012 | 1996 |
| Headquarters | Solihull, United Kingdom | Baltimore, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Gymshark | Under Armour |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 2,500 | Not published |
| Total funding | $261M | $815M |
| Latest round | Series A | Post IPO Debt |
| Valuation | $1.4B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 401,437 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Gymshark | Under Armour |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 66/100 | 24/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 40/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 40/100 |
| Search visibility | 24/100 | 24/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 15/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 79/100 | 81/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Gymshark | Under Armour |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Shopify | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
Gymshark vs Under Armour: common questions
Which is better, Gymshark or Under Armour?
On our 0-100 score Gymshark rates higher (66/100 against 24/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Gymshark and Under Armour compare on the numbers?
Gymshark leads on our overall score (66/100 against 24/100). Under Armour leads on funding raised ($815M against $261M).
Read the full Gymshark review and pricing or the Under Armour review and pricing. You can also browse other Gymshark alternatives we track.