Opmed.AI vs Navina
Opmed.AI vs Navina, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Opmed.AI is on 58/100 and Navina on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Opmed.AI
- agent readiness: 40/100 against 32/100
- headcount growth: +72.2% against +35.1%
Navina
- our overall score: 63/100 against 58/100
- headcount: 137 against 64
- funding raised: $99.0M against $15.0M
- LinkedIn following: 13,257 against 9,858
At a glance
| Measure | Opmed.AI | Navina |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered platform optimizing healthcare planning and hospital operations, especially OR scheduling. | AI-powered platform that simplifies complex patient data for physicians. |
| Category | Healthcare, Hospital, Optimization, Planning | Healthcare, Data, Patient Data, HealthTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2020 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Opmed.AI | Navina |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 64 | 137 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +72.2% | +35.1% |
| Total funding | $15.0M | $99.0M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 9,858 | 13,257 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Opmed.AI | Navina |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 58/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 54/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 27/100 | 49/100 |
| Quality | 62/100 | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (40/100) | F (32/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 41/100 | 42/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Opmed.AI | Navina |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | Webflow |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Opmed.AI vs Navina: common questions
Which is better, Opmed.AI or Navina?
On our 0-100 score Navina rates higher (63/100 against 58/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Opmed.AI and Navina compare on the numbers?
Opmed.AI leads on agent readiness (40/100 against 32/100), headcount growth (+72.2% against +35.1%). Navina leads on our overall score (63/100 against 58/100), headcount (137 against 64), funding raised ($99.0M against $15.0M), LinkedIn following (13,257 against 9,858).
Read the full Opmed.AI review and pricing or the Navina review and pricing. You can also browse other Opmed.AI alternatives we track.