GR3N vs UBQ Materials
GR3N vs UBQ Materials, compared side by side on 11 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: GR3N is on 57/100 and UBQ Materials on 51/100.
Where each one leads
GR3N
- our overall score: 57/100 against 51/100
UBQ Materials
- funding raised: $240M against $15.5M
At a glance
| Measure | GR3N | UBQ Materials |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | CleanTech company specializing in PET/polyester plastics and fibres recycling using microwave-assisted depolymerisation. | UBQ Materials converts unsorted household waste into a sustainable, bio-based thermoplastic material, replacing conventional plastics and other finite resources. |
| Category | Cleantech, Recycling, Materials Science, Chemicals | Cleantech, Recycling, Packaging, Plastic |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Material |
| Founded | 2013 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Lugano, Switzerland | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | GR3N | UBQ Materials |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 80 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +9.3% |
| Total funding | $15.5M | $240M |
| Latest round | Series B | Funding Round |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 20,076 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | GR3N | UBQ Materials |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 57/100 | 51/100 |
| Traction | 13/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | Not published | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | Not published | 34/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 55/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | Not published | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | Not published | 53/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | GR3N | UBQ Materials |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
What users say
| Measure | GR3N | UBQ Materials |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 5 positive, 1 negative across 6 threads |
“UBQ Materials can convert 100% of the waste stream to a plastic substitute. Does this mean the end for landfills?.”r/enviroaction
GR3N vs UBQ Materials: common questions
Which is better, GR3N or UBQ Materials?
On our 0-100 score GR3N rates higher (57/100 against 51/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 11 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do GR3N and UBQ Materials compare on the numbers?
GR3N leads on our overall score (57/100 against 51/100). UBQ Materials leads on funding raised ($240M against $15.5M).
What do real users say about GR3N and UBQ Materials?
UBQ Materials: 5 positive and 1 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/enviroaction.
Read the full GR3N review and pricing or the UBQ Materials review and pricing. You can also browse other GR3N alternatives we track.