Gloo vs With
Gloo vs With, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Gloo is on 35/100 and With on 53/100.
Where each one leads
Gloo
- agent readiness: 37/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 67/100 against 59/100
- headcount: 282 against 30
- funding raised: $60.0M against $10.0M
- LinkedIn following: 15,405 against 2,957
With
- our overall score: 53/100 against 35/100
At a glance
| Measure | Gloo | With |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered platform connecting people to faith communities and resources. | A simple operating system for organizations to engage people around social, financial, and environmental goals. |
| Category | FaithTech, Community Engagement, AI-Powered Platform, Non-profit Technology | Social, Smart City, Enterprise Software, Collaboration |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2010 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | Franklin, United States | Not published |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Gloo | With |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 282 | 30 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +11.2% |
| Total funding | $60.0M | $10.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 15,405 | 2,957 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Gloo | With |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 35/100 | 53/100 |
| Traction | 31/100 | 50/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | Not published | 10/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (37/100) | F (22/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 67/100 | 59/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Gloo | With |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Framer | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
Gloo vs With: common questions
Which is better, Gloo or With?
On our 0-100 score With rates higher (53/100 against 35/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Gloo and With compare on the numbers?
Gloo leads on agent readiness (37/100 against 22/100), domain rating (67/100 against 59/100), headcount (282 against 30), funding raised ($60.0M against $10.0M), LinkedIn following (15,405 against 2,957). With leads on our overall score (53/100 against 35/100).
Read the full Gloo review and pricing or the With review and pricing. You can also browse other Gloo alternatives we track.