GitHub Copilot Agent Mode vs Sourcegraph (Cody)
GitHub Copilot Agent Mode vs Sourcegraph (Cody), compared side by side on 11 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: GitHub Copilot Agent Mode is on 13/100 and Sourcegraph (Cody) on 60/100.
Where each one leads
GitHub Copilot Agent Mode
- domain rating: 97/100 against 80/100
Sourcegraph (Cody)
- our overall score: 60/100 against 13/100
At a glance
| Measure | GitHub Copilot Agent Mode | Sourcegraph (Cody) |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | An upcoming autonomous AI agent mode for GitHub Copilot designed to handle complex development tasks. | AI coding assistant that understands, writes, and fixes code faster using LLMs and code context. |
| Category | AI Coding Assistant, AI Copilot, Developer Tools, Agentic AI | AI Coding Assistant, AI Copilot, Developer Tools, Foundation Model |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | Not published | 2013 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | GitHub Copilot Agent Mode | Sourcegraph (Cody) |
|---|---|---|
| Total funding | Not published | $301M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series D |
| Valuation | Not published | $2.6B |
| LinkedIn followers | 6,239,881 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | GitHub Copilot Agent Mode | Sourcegraph (Cody) |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 13/100 | 60/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 40/100 |
| Team | Not published | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 97/100 | 80/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | GitHub Copilot Agent Mode | Sourcegraph (Cody) |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Svelte |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | GitHub Copilot Agent Mode | Sourcegraph (Cody) |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 2 positive, 2 negative across 6 threads | Not published |
“I have just experienced GitHub Copilot's Agent Mode, and it's absolutely incredible. While the technology isn't perfect yet, it's already mind-blowing. I simply opened a new folder in VSCode, created an 'images' directory, and added a few p”r/ChatGPTCoding
GitHub Copilot Agent Mode vs Sourcegraph (Cody): common questions
Which is better, GitHub Copilot Agent Mode or Sourcegraph (Cody)?
On our 0-100 score Sourcegraph (Cody) rates higher (60/100 against 13/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 11 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do GitHub Copilot Agent Mode and Sourcegraph (Cody) compare on the numbers?
GitHub Copilot Agent Mode leads on domain rating (97/100 against 80/100). Sourcegraph (Cody) leads on our overall score (60/100 against 13/100).
What do real users say about GitHub Copilot Agent Mode and Sourcegraph (Cody)?
GitHub Copilot Agent Mode: 2 positive and 2 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/ChatGPTCoding.
Read the full GitHub Copilot Agent Mode review and pricing or the Sourcegraph (Cody) review and pricing. You can also browse other GitHub Copilot Agent Mode alternatives we track.