Genomic Health vs Natera
Genomic Health vs Natera, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Genomic Health is on 58/100 and Natera on 41/100.
Where each one leads
Genomic Health
- our overall score: 58/100 against 41/100
- funding raised: $300M against $54.6M
Natera
- agent readiness: 49/100 against 32/100
- LinkedIn following: 225,919 against 159,410
At a glance
| Measure | Genomic Health | Natera |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Consumer genomics platform for health insights and predictions. | Natera is a global leader in cell-free DNA testing, providing genetic testing services for reproductive health, oncology, and organ transplantation. |
| Category | HealthTech, Genomics, Personalized Medicine, Consumer Genomics | HealthTech, MedTech, Genomics, Clinical Trials |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Services |
| Founded | 2023 | 2004 |
| Headquarters | Redwood City, United States | Austin, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Genomic Health | Natera |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 5,337 | 5,831 |
| Total funding | $300M | $54.6M |
| Latest round | Series G | Series E |
| LinkedIn followers | 159,410 | 225,919 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Genomic Health | Natera |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 58/100 | 41/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | 50/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 22/100 | 23/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 30/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (32/100) | D (49/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | 72/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Genomic Health | Natera |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | AWS |
| CDN | CloudFront | CloudFront |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Bootstrap | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
Genomic Health vs Natera: common questions
Which is better, Genomic Health or Natera?
On our 0-100 score Genomic Health rates higher (58/100 against 41/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Genomic Health and Natera compare on the numbers?
Genomic Health leads on our overall score (58/100 against 41/100), funding raised ($300M against $54.6M). Natera leads on agent readiness (49/100 against 32/100), LinkedIn following (225,919 against 159,410).
Read the full Genomic Health review and pricing or the Natera review and pricing. You can also browse other Genomic Health alternatives we track.