Genomic Health vs InsideTracker
Genomic Health vs InsideTracker, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Genomic Health is on 58/100 and InsideTracker on 61/100.
Where each one leads
Genomic Health
- headcount: 5,337 against 54
- funding raised: $300M against $45.0M
- LinkedIn following: 159,410 against 18,119
InsideTracker
- agent readiness: 53/100 against 32/100
At a glance
| Measure | Genomic Health | InsideTracker |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Consumer genomics platform for health insights and predictions. | Personalized health and performance insights based on blood biomarkers and DNA. |
| Category | HealthTech, Genomics, Personalized Medicine, Consumer Genomics | HealthTech, Longevity, Genomics, Biotech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2C |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2023 | 2009 |
| Headquarters | Redwood City, United States | Boston, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Genomic Health | InsideTracker |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 5,337 | 54 |
| Total funding | $300M | $45.0M |
| Latest round | Series G | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 159,410 | 18,119 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Genomic Health | InsideTracker |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 58/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 56/100 |
| Team | 50/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 22/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (32/100) | D (53/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | 70/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Genomic Health | InsideTracker |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Azure |
| CDN | CloudFront | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Bootstrap | Next.js |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Genomic Health vs InsideTracker: common questions
Which is better, Genomic Health or InsideTracker?
On our 0-100 score InsideTracker rates higher (61/100 against 58/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Genomic Health and InsideTracker compare on the numbers?
Genomic Health leads on headcount (5,337 against 54), funding raised ($300M against $45.0M), LinkedIn following (159,410 against 18,119). InsideTracker leads on agent readiness (53/100 against 32/100).
Read the full Genomic Health review and pricing or the InsideTracker review and pricing. You can also browse other Genomic Health alternatives we track.