FloLIVE vs Ligado Networks
FloLIVE vs Ligado Networks, compared side by side on 24 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: FloLIVE is on 59/100 and Ligado Networks on 52/100.
Where each one leads
FloLIVE
- our overall score: 59/100 against 52/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 39/100
- domain rating: 48/100 against 35/100
- headcount: 179 against 70
- headcount growth: +14.5% against -12.1%
- LinkedIn following: 17,368 against 2,610
Ligado Networks
- funding raised: $4.0B against $88.2M
At a glance
| Measure | FloLIVE | Ligado Networks |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global cellular connectivity and private 5G network solutions for IoT. | Mobile satellite services and direct-to-device connectivity using licensed L-band spectrum. |
| Category | IoT, Connected Device, 5G, Network | Satellite, Telecom Infrastructure, 5G, SpaceTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2015 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Reston, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | FloLIVE | Ligado Networks |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 179 | 70 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +14.5% | -12.1% |
| Total funding | $88.2M | $4.0B |
| Latest round | Series C | Series E |
| LinkedIn followers | 17,368 | 2,610 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | FloLIVE | Ligado Networks |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 59/100 | 52/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 20/100 |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 47/100 |
| Quality | 60/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 48/100 | 35/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | FloLIVE | Ligado Networks |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity | Google Analytics 4 |
| Support stack | HubSpot | HubSpot |
FloLIVE vs Ligado Networks: common questions
Which is better, FloLIVE or Ligado Networks?
On our 0-100 score FloLIVE rates higher (59/100 against 52/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 24 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do FloLIVE and Ligado Networks compare on the numbers?
FloLIVE leads on our overall score (59/100 against 52/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 39/100), domain rating (48/100 against 35/100), headcount (179 against 70), headcount growth (+14.5% against -12.1%), LinkedIn following (17,368 against 2,610). Ligado Networks leads on funding raised ($4.0B against $88.2M).
Read the full FloLIVE review and pricing or the Ligado Networks review and pricing. You can also browse other FloLIVE alternatives we track.