FloLIVE vs hiSky
FloLIVE vs hiSky, compared side by side on 23 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: FloLIVE is on 59/100 and hiSky on 53/100.
Where each one leads
FloLIVE
- our overall score: 59/100 against 53/100
- domain rating: 48/100 against 34/100
- headcount: 179 against 125
- funding raised: $88.2M against $30.0M
- LinkedIn following: 17,368 against 6,165
hiSky
- headcount growth: +31.8% against +14.5%
At a glance
| Measure | FloLIVE | hiSky |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global cellular connectivity and private 5G network solutions for IoT. | Agile IoT networks enabling global connectivity for businesses, people, and machines. |
| Category | IoT, Connected Device, 5G, Network | IoT, Network, Industrial, Satellite |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Hardware, Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | FloLIVE | hiSky |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 179 | 125 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +14.5% | +31.8% |
| Total funding | $88.2M | $30.0M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 17,368 | 6,165 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | FloLIVE | hiSky |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 59/100 | 53/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 57/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 60/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 48/100 | 34/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | FloLIVE | hiSky |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity | Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
FloLIVE vs hiSky: common questions
Which is better, FloLIVE or hiSky?
On our 0-100 score FloLIVE rates higher (59/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 23 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do FloLIVE and hiSky compare on the numbers?
FloLIVE leads on our overall score (59/100 against 53/100), domain rating (48/100 against 34/100), headcount (179 against 125), funding raised ($88.2M against $30.0M), LinkedIn following (17,368 against 6,165). hiSky leads on headcount growth (+31.8% against +14.5%).
Read the full FloLIVE review and pricing or the hiSky review and pricing. You can also browse other FloLIVE alternatives we track.