Flock Safety vs Virtual Guard
Flock Safety vs Virtual Guard, compared side by side on 13 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Flock Safety is on 55/100 and Virtual Guard on 25/100.
Where each one leads
Flock Safety
- our overall score: 55/100 against 25/100
- agent readiness: 43/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 74/100 against 8/100
Virtual Guard
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Flock Safety | Virtual Guard |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered surveillance cameras for public safety. | AI-enabled security solutions combining live video monitoring with human vigilance for proactive threat prevention. |
| Category | Security, Artificial Intelligence, Government, Law Enforcement | Security, AI, Video Surveillance, Remote Monitoring |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2G | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Software | services |
| Founded | 2017 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Scottsdale, USA | Brooklyn, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Flock Safety | Virtual Guard |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 9 |
| Total funding | $63.0M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series C | Not published |
| Valuation | $1.1B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 4,076 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Flock Safety | Virtual Guard |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 25/100 |
| Traction | 39/100 | 10/100 |
| Team | Not published | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 25/100 | 41/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (43/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 74/100 | 8/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Flock Safety | Virtual Guard |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity |
Flock Safety vs Virtual Guard: common questions
Which is better, Flock Safety or Virtual Guard?
On our 0-100 score Flock Safety rates higher (55/100 against 25/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 13 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Flock Safety and Virtual Guard compare on the numbers?
Flock Safety leads on our overall score (55/100 against 25/100), agent readiness (43/100 against 21/100), domain rating (74/100 against 8/100).
Read the full Flock Safety review and pricing or the Virtual Guard review and pricing. You can also browse other Flock Safety alternatives we track.