Fitbank vs Razorpay
Fitbank vs Razorpay, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Fitbank is on 66/100 and Razorpay on 73/100.
Where each one leads
Fitbank
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Razorpay
- our overall score: 73/100 against 66/100
- agent readiness: 76/100 against 42/100
- domain rating: 90/100 against 27/100
- headcount: 4,067 against 750
- LinkedIn following: 1,222,072 against 32,725
At a glance
| Measure | Fitbank | Razorpay |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A financial institution that offers a platform for digital banking and payment solutions. | A leading payment gateway and financial services platform for businesses in India. |
| Category | Not published | Fintech, Payments, Digital Payments, Embedded Finance |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2015 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | São Paulo, Brazil | Bengaluru, India |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Fitbank | Razorpay |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 750 | 4,067 |
| Total funding | $502K | Not published |
| Latest round | Seed | Not published |
| Valuation | Not published | $7.5B |
| LinkedIn followers | 32,725 | 1,222,072 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Fitbank | Razorpay |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 66/100 | 73/100 |
| Traction | 49/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 46/100 | 24/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 89/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (42/100) | B (76/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 27/100 | 90/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Fitbank | Razorpay |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | AWS |
| CDN | CloudFront | CloudFront |
| CMS | WordPress | Framer |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Segment, Microsoft Clarity |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Fitbank vs Razorpay: common questions
Which is better, Fitbank or Razorpay?
On our 0-100 score Razorpay rates higher (73/100 against 66/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Fitbank and Razorpay compare on the numbers?
Razorpay leads on our overall score (73/100 against 66/100), agent readiness (76/100 against 42/100), domain rating (90/100 against 27/100), headcount (4,067 against 750), LinkedIn following (1,222,072 against 32,725).
Read the full Fitbank review and pricing or the Razorpay review and pricing. You can also browse other Fitbank alternatives we track.