Fiserv Inc. vs Kima
Fiserv Inc. vs Kima, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Fiserv Inc. is on 77/100 and Kima on 50/100.
Where each one leads
Fiserv Inc.
- our overall score: 77/100 against 50/100
- agent readiness: 41/100 against 35/100
- domain rating: 83/100 against 32/100
- headcount: 33,292 against 35
- funding raised: $300M against $6.7M
- LinkedIn following: 917,100 against 7,775
Kima
- headcount growth: +28.7% against +6.4%
At a glance
| Measure | Fiserv Inc. | Kima |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global financial technology provider for banks, credit unions, merchants, and businesses. | Fintech protocol for universal liquidity, fixing DeFi interoperability by uniting fragmented blockchains and assets. |
| Category | Banking Technology, Embedded Finance, Payments, Crypto Exchange | Blockchain, DeFi, Fintech, Web3 |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | services | platform | Platform |
| Founded | 1984 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | Milwaukee, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Fiserv Inc. | Kima |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 33,292 | 35 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +6.4% | +28.7% |
| Total funding | $300M | $6.7M |
| Latest round | Venture | Pre-Seed |
| Valuation | $45B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 917,100 | 7,775 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Fiserv Inc. | Kima |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 77/100 | 50/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 50/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 46/100 | 28/100 |
| Quality | 92/100 | 48/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | F (35/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 83/100 | 32/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Fiserv Inc. | Kima |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Tailwind CSS |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Fiserv Inc. vs Kima: common questions
Which is better, Fiserv Inc. or Kima?
On our 0-100 score Fiserv Inc. rates higher (77/100 against 50/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Fiserv Inc. and Kima compare on the numbers?
Fiserv Inc. leads on our overall score (77/100 against 50/100), agent readiness (41/100 against 35/100), domain rating (83/100 against 32/100), headcount (33,292 against 35), funding raised ($300M against $6.7M), LinkedIn following (917,100 against 7,775). Kima leads on headcount growth (+28.7% against +6.4%).
Read the full Fiserv Inc. review and pricing or the Kima review and pricing. You can also browse other Fiserv Inc. alternatives we track.