Firecrawl vs Tavily
Firecrawl vs Tavily, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Firecrawl is on 65/100 and Tavily on 57/100.
Where each one leads
Firecrawl
- our overall score: 65/100 against 57/100
- funding raised: $29.0M against $5.0M
- LinkedIn following: 61,399 against 26,331
Tavily
- headcount: 94 against 49
At a glance
| Measure | Firecrawl | Tavily |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Firecrawl provides web scraping and crawling APIs for developers and AI agents to power applications with clean, LLM-ready data. | AI-native search engine API for RAG and AI agents, providing factual and reliable information. |
| Category | Agentic AI, AI Agent, Web Scraping, Web Crawling | Generative AI, Research, AI Agents, Agentic AI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2023 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Firecrawl | Tavily |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 49 | 94 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +500.0% | +500.0% |
| Total funding | $29.0M | $5.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 61,399 | 26,331 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Firecrawl | Tavily |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 65/100 | 57/100 |
| Traction | 54/100 | 53/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 54/100 |
| Quality | 72/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (64/100) | C (67/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 78/100 | 77/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Firecrawl | Tavily |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | AWS |
| CDN | Vercel | CloudFront |
| CMS | Not detected | Ghost |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Next.js |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Firecrawl | Tavily |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Scrape API, Crawl Capabilities, Web Search Integration, Authenticated Scraping, Media Parsing, Smart Wait & Actions | Not published |
| Current offer | 10% off for their first purchase | Not published |
What users say
| Measure | Firecrawl | Tavily |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 3 negative across 6 threads | Not published |
“What is the best scraper tool right now? Firecrawl is great, but I want to explore more options. I’ve been using Firecrawl lately (which is great), but I’m more curious what others are using right now for a scalable scraping like large site”r/LocalLLaMA
Firecrawl vs Tavily: common questions
Which is better, Firecrawl or Tavily?
On our 0-100 score Firecrawl rates higher (65/100 against 57/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Firecrawl and Tavily compare on the numbers?
Firecrawl leads on our overall score (65/100 against 57/100), funding raised ($29.0M against $5.0M), LinkedIn following (61,399 against 26,331). Tavily leads on headcount (94 against 49).
What do real users say about Firecrawl and Tavily?
Firecrawl: 1 positive and 3 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/LocalLLaMA.
Read the full Firecrawl review and pricing or the Tavily review and pricing. You can also browse other Firecrawl alternatives we track.