FireCompass vs Tenable
FireCompass vs Tenable, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: FireCompass is on 39/100 and Tenable on 62/100.
Where each one leads
FireCompass
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Tenable
- our overall score: 62/100 against 39/100
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 42/100
- domain rating: 84/100 against 46/100
- funding raised: $65.0M against $27.0M
At a glance
| Measure | FireCompass | Tenable |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered attack surface management and digital risk protection platform. | Cybersecurity risk management platform that provides vulnerability management, attack surface management, and cloud security solutions. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Attack Surface Management, Digital Risk Protection, Threat Detection | Cybersecurity, Vulnerability Management, Attack Surface Management, Cloud Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2019 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Columbia, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | FireCompass | Tenable |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 24 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -35.0% |
| Total funding | $27.0M | $65.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 8,859 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | FireCompass | Tenable |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 39/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 38/100 | 53/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | Not published | 38/100 |
| Quality | 40/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (42/100) | D (51/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 46/100 | 84/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | FireCompass | Tenable |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
What users say
| Measure | FireCompass | Tenable |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 2 positive, 0 negative across 6 threads |
“I read the latest announcement from #microsoft about the general availability of #MicrosoftTVM with #vulcancyber and here's a short video on the setup and configuration. Initial thoughts; excellent interface, rich information, massive libra”r/DefenderATP
FireCompass vs Tenable: common questions
Which is better, FireCompass or Tenable?
On our 0-100 score Tenable rates higher (62/100 against 39/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do FireCompass and Tenable compare on the numbers?
Tenable leads on our overall score (62/100 against 39/100), agent readiness (51/100 against 42/100), domain rating (84/100 against 46/100), funding raised ($65.0M against $27.0M).
What do real users say about FireCompass and Tenable?
Tenable: 2 positive and 0 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/DefenderATP.
Read the full FireCompass review and pricing or the Tenable review and pricing. You can also browse other FireCompass alternatives we track.