Finclude vs Plend
Finclude vs Plend, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Finclude is on 13/100 and Plend on 53/100.
Where each one leads
Finclude
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Plend
- our overall score: 53/100 against 13/100
- headcount: 26 against 6
At a glance
| Measure | Finclude | Plend |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered credit scoring for individuals and businesses without traditional credit history. | Responsible lender tackling financial exclusion in the UK. |
| Category | Fintech, Lending, Embedded Finance, AI-Driven Parametric Insurance | Fintech, Lending, Financial Inclusion, Consumer Lending |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Software | platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2018 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Not published | London, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Finclude | Plend |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 6 | 26 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -44.7% | Not published |
| Total funding | Not published | $62.7M |
| Latest round | Not published | Funding Round |
| LinkedIn followers | 4,044 | 4,800 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Finclude | Plend |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 13/100 | 53/100 |
| Traction | 8/100 | 53/100 |
| Team | Not published | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 22/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 62/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (39/100) | F (36/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 33/100 | 36/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Finclude | Plend |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Support stack | Not detected | Intercom, Zendesk |
Finclude vs Plend: common questions
Which is better, Finclude or Plend?
On our 0-100 score Plend rates higher (53/100 against 13/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Finclude and Plend compare on the numbers?
Plend leads on our overall score (53/100 against 13/100), headcount (26 against 6).
Read the full Finclude review and pricing or the Plend review and pricing. You can also browse other Finclude alternatives we track.