Finclude vs Noble
Finclude vs Noble, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Finclude is on 13/100 and Noble on 46/100.
Where each one leads
Finclude
- agent readiness: 39/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 33/100 against 16/100
- LinkedIn following: 4,044 against 1,270
Noble
- our overall score: 46/100 against 13/100
- headcount: 9 against 6
- headcount growth: -30.7% against -44.7%
At a glance
| Measure | Finclude | Noble |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered credit scoring for individuals and businesses without traditional credit history. | Infrastructure for building and scaling digital financial products, focusing on identity, risk, and credit. |
| Category | Fintech, Lending, Embedded Finance, AI-Driven Parametric Insurance | Fintech, Embedded Finance, Lending, Credit Scoring |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2018 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Not published | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Finclude | Noble |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 6 | 9 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -44.7% | -30.7% |
| LinkedIn followers | 4,044 | 1,270 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Finclude | Noble |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 13/100 | 46/100 |
| Traction | 8/100 | 10/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 22/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (39/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 33/100 | 16/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Finclude | Noble |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
Finclude vs Noble: common questions
Which is better, Finclude or Noble?
On our 0-100 score Noble rates higher (46/100 against 13/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Finclude and Noble compare on the numbers?
Finclude leads on agent readiness (39/100 against 21/100), domain rating (33/100 against 16/100), LinkedIn following (4,044 against 1,270). Noble leads on our overall score (46/100 against 13/100), headcount (9 against 6), headcount growth (-30.7% against -44.7%).
Read the full Finclude review and pricing or the Noble review and pricing. You can also browse other Finclude alternatives we track.