Figure vs StereoLabs
Figure vs StereoLabs, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Figure is on 57/100 and StereoLabs on 54/100.
Where each one leads
Figure
- our overall score: 57/100 against 54/100
- domain rating: 73/100 against 63/100
- headcount: 673 against 58
- funding raised: $4.0B against $30.0M
- LinkedIn following: 124,551 against 8,354
StereoLabs
- agent readiness: 59/100 against 36/100
At a glance
| Measure | Figure | StereoLabs |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Building humanoid robots for commercial work, currently deployed at scale with BMW, Mercedes-Benz, and Amazon. | Vision-based perception systems for robotics and industrial applications. |
| Category | Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, Hardware, Physical AI | Robotics, Hardware, Computer Vision, Computer Vision Hardware |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 2018 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | Sunnyvale, United States | Paris, France |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Figure | StereoLabs |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 673 | 58 |
| Total funding | $4.0B | $30.0M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series B |
| Valuation | $4K | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 124,551 | 8,354 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Figure | StereoLabs |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 57/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 55/100 |
| Team | 20/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 25/100 | 24/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (36/100) | D (59/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | 63/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Figure | StereoLabs |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Vercel |
| CDN | Vercel | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Next.js | Next.js |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | No | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | Figure | StereoLabs |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 0 negative across 1 thread | Not published |
“Figure 03 Robot sorting packages while Marc Benioff messes with it. https://x.com/Benioff/status/2036252519308075219”r/nextfuckinglevel
Figure vs StereoLabs: common questions
Which is better, Figure or StereoLabs?
On our 0-100 score Figure rates higher (57/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Figure and StereoLabs compare on the numbers?
Figure leads on our overall score (57/100 against 54/100), domain rating (73/100 against 63/100), headcount (673 against 58), funding raised ($4.0B against $30.0M), LinkedIn following (124,551 against 8,354). StereoLabs leads on agent readiness (59/100 against 36/100).
What do real users say about Figure and StereoLabs?
Figure: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 1 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/nextfuckinglevel.
Read the full Figure review and pricing or the StereoLabs review and pricing. You can also browse other Figure alternatives we track.