feld.ai vs InstaDeep
feld.ai vs InstaDeep, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: feld.ai is on 3/100 and InstaDeep on 65/100.
Where each one leads
feld.ai
- agent readiness: 57/100 against 51/100
InstaDeep
- our overall score: 65/100 against 3/100
- domain rating: 59/100 against 19/100
- headcount: 415 against 7
- LinkedIn following: 86,589 against 266
At a glance
| Measure | feld.ai | InstaDeep |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | feld.ai automates document processing with AI, offering classification, extraction, and validation with 100% EU-hosting. | InstaDeep is a global AI leader specializing in decision-making AI systems for enterprises, with roots in Africa and offices worldwide. |
| Category | Document Processing AI, Data Extraction, Document Classification, Workflow Automation | Decision-Making AI, Enterprise Software, Biotech, Logistics |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2026 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Feldkirch, Austria | Tunis, Tunisia |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | feld.ai | InstaDeep |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 7 | 415 |
| Total funding | Not published | $177M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 266 | 86,589 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | feld.ai | InstaDeep |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 3/100 | 65/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 50/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | Not published | 37/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (57/100) | D (51/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 19/100 | 59/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | feld.ai | InstaDeep |
|---|---|---|
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Plausible | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | No | Yes |
feld.ai vs InstaDeep: common questions
Which is better, feld.ai or InstaDeep?
On our 0-100 score InstaDeep rates higher (65/100 against 3/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do feld.ai and InstaDeep compare on the numbers?
feld.ai leads on agent readiness (57/100 against 51/100). InstaDeep leads on our overall score (65/100 against 3/100), domain rating (59/100 against 19/100), headcount (415 against 7), LinkedIn following (86,589 against 266).
Read the full feld.ai review and pricing or the InstaDeep review and pricing. You can also browse other feld.ai alternatives we track.