FDNA vs Viz.ai
FDNA vs Viz.ai, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: FDNA is on 59/100 and Viz.ai on 74/100.
Where each one leads
FDNA
- headcount growth: +15.0% against -4.9%
Viz.ai
- our overall score: 74/100 against 59/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 68/100 against 45/100
- headcount: 331 against 43
- funding raised: $292M against $25.0M
- LinkedIn following: 48,917 against 3,123
At a glance
| Measure | FDNA | Viz.ai |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Detecting rare diseases early with the help of AI Imagine a world where every person’s genome serves as their medical record to guide health decisions. | AI-powered care coordination platform for faster diagnosis and treatment of critical conditions. |
| Category | Healthcare, Medical Imaging, Phenotype, Facial | Healthcare, Medical Imaging, Strokes, Healthcare AI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2010 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Boston, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | FDNA | Viz.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 43 | 331 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +15.0% | -4.9% |
| Total funding | $25.0M | $292M |
| Latest round | Seed | Not published |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.2B |
| LinkedIn followers | 3,123 | 48,917 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | FDNA | Viz.ai |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 59/100 | 74/100 |
| Traction | 53/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | 20/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 86/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 45/100 | 68/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | FDNA | Viz.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Tailwind CSS | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar |
| Support stack | Not detected | Helpscout |
What users say
| Measure | FDNA | Viz.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | Not published | 5.0/5 from 1 vote |
FDNA vs Viz.ai: common questions
Which is better, FDNA or Viz.ai?
On our 0-100 score Viz.ai rates higher (74/100 against 59/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do FDNA and Viz.ai compare on the numbers?
FDNA leads on headcount growth (+15.0% against -4.9%). Viz.ai leads on our overall score (74/100 against 59/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 21/100), domain rating (68/100 against 45/100), headcount (331 against 43), funding raised ($292M against $25.0M), LinkedIn following (48,917 against 3,123).
Read the full FDNA review and pricing or the Viz.ai review and pricing. You can also browse other FDNA alternatives we track.