Fathom vs Jumps
Fathom vs Jumps, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Fathom is on 60/100 and Jumps on 53/100.
Where each one leads
Fathom
- our overall score: 60/100 against 53/100
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 76/100 against 59/100
- headcount: 182 against 2
- LinkedIn following: 16,597 against 20
Jumps
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Fathom | Jumps |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Fathom is an AI meeting assistant that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings on Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams, allowing users to focus on the conversation. | AI-powered meeting workflow platform for financial advisors covering preparation, note-taking, compliance, and follow-up. |
| Category | AI Meeting Assistant, Conversational AI, Voice AI, Productivity Software | Fintech, WealthTech, Financial Services, Voice AI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B SaaS |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2020 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Salt Lake City, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Fathom | Jumps |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 182 | 2 |
| Open roles | 5 | Not published |
| Total funding | $17.0M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 16,597 | 20 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Fathom | Jumps |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 60/100 | 53/100 |
| Traction | 56/100 | 5/100 |
| Team | 40/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 48/100 | 25/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 59/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Fathom | Jumps |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Flyio |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | Ghost |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Amplitude | Google Tag Manager, PostHog |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Fathom | Jumps |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | AI Meeting Summaries, CRM Integration, Shareable Clips, Multi-Language Support, Ask Fathom AI Assistant, Action Item Detection | Not published |
Fathom vs Jumps: common questions
Which is better, Fathom or Jumps?
On our 0-100 score Fathom rates higher (60/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Fathom and Jumps compare on the numbers?
Fathom leads on our overall score (60/100 against 53/100), agent readiness (45/100 against 21/100), domain rating (76/100 against 59/100), headcount (182 against 2), LinkedIn following (16,597 against 20).
Read the full Fathom review and pricing or the Jumps review and pricing. You can also browse other Fathom alternatives we track.