Factorial vs Payfit
Factorial vs Payfit, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Factorial is on 64/100 and Payfit on 69/100.
Where each one leads
Factorial
- headcount: 2,695 against 792
- headcount growth: +19.9% against -7.4%
- LinkedIn following: 156,181 against 90,546
Payfit
- our overall score: 69/100 against 64/100
At a glance
| Measure | Factorial | Payfit |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered platform automating HR, payroll, and finance for European businesses. | Integrated payroll and HR management platform for startups and SMEs. |
| Category | HR Tech, SMB Software, Workflow Automation, Business Intelligence | HR Tech, Fintech, SMB Software, Payroll Software |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2016 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Barcelona, Spain | Paris, France |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Factorial | Payfit |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 2,695 | 792 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +19.9% | -7.4% |
| Total funding | $572M | $474M |
| Latest round | Series D | Series E |
| Valuation | $2.5B | $1.8B |
| LinkedIn followers | 156,181 | 90,546 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Factorial | Payfit |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 64/100 | 69/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 41/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (53/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 77/100 | 72/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Factorial | Payfit |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | CloudFront |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Astro, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Factorial vs Payfit: common questions
Which is better, Factorial or Payfit?
On our 0-100 score Payfit rates higher (69/100 against 64/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Factorial and Payfit compare on the numbers?
Factorial leads on headcount (2,695 against 792), headcount growth (+19.9% against -7.4%), LinkedIn following (156,181 against 90,546). Payfit leads on our overall score (69/100 against 64/100).
Read the full Factorial review and pricing or the Payfit review and pricing. You can also browse other Factorial alternatives we track.