Factorial vs Homebase
Factorial vs Homebase, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Factorial is on 64/100 and Homebase on 69/100.
Where each one leads
Factorial
- headcount: 2,695 against 1,883
- headcount growth: +19.9% against +14.9%
- funding raised: $572M against $159M
- LinkedIn following: 156,181 against 18,307
Homebase
- our overall score: 69/100 against 64/100
At a glance
| Measure | Factorial | Homebase |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered platform automating HR, payroll, and finance for European businesses. | All-in-one platform for small businesses to manage scheduling, time clocks, payroll, and HR. |
| Category | HR Tech, SMB Software, Workflow Automation, Business Intelligence | HR Tech, SMB Software, Vertical SaaS, Fleet Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2016 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Barcelona, Spain | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Factorial | Homebase |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 2,695 | 1,883 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +19.9% | +14.9% |
| Total funding | $572M | $159M |
| Latest round | Series D | Series D |
| Valuation | $2.5B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 156,181 | 18,307 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Factorial | Homebase |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 64/100 | 69/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 41/100 | 37/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (53/100) | D (56/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 77/100 | 78/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Factorial | Homebase |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Alpinejs, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager, Amplitude, Hotjar |
Factorial vs Homebase: common questions
Which is better, Factorial or Homebase?
On our 0-100 score Homebase rates higher (69/100 against 64/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Factorial and Homebase compare on the numbers?
Factorial leads on headcount (2,695 against 1,883), headcount growth (+19.9% against +14.9%), funding raised ($572M against $159M), LinkedIn following (156,181 against 18,307). Homebase leads on our overall score (69/100 against 64/100).
Read the full Factorial review and pricing or the Homebase review and pricing. You can also browse other Factorial alternatives we track.