Traceloop vs Groundcover
Traceloop vs Groundcover, compared side by side on 23 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Traceloop is on 55/100 and Groundcover on 64/100.
Where each one leads
Traceloop
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Groundcover
- our overall score: 64/100 against 55/100
- agent readiness: 52/100 against 37/100
- headcount: 129 against 10
- funding raised: $155M against $6.1M
- LinkedIn following: 9,827 against 973
At a glance
| Measure | Traceloop | Groundcover |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | An LLM reliability platform for faster, more confident LLM application development. | Kubernetes application monitoring using eBPF for deep visibility and performance insights, offering a cloud-native observability platform. |
| Category | LLMOps, AI Observability, Foundation Model, Large Language Model | Observability, Cloud Infrastructure, Application Performance Monitoring, Infrastructure Monitoring |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2023 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Traceloop | Groundcover |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 10 | 129 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +78.4% | +65.9% |
| Total funding | $6.1M | $155M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series C |
| Valuation | Not published | $500M |
| LinkedIn followers | 973 | 9,827 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Traceloop | Groundcover |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 64/100 |
| Traction | 44/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 41/100 | 51/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (37/100) | D (52/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 64/100 | 68/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Traceloop | Groundcover |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Traceloop | Groundcover |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Continuous Feedback Loop, Real-time LLM Monitoring, Automated Quality Checks, Custom Evaluator Training, CI/CD Pipeline Integration, Open Standards & Open Source | Not published |
What users say
| Measure | Traceloop | Groundcover |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 1 positive, 0 negative across 1 thread |
“We’re part of the founding engineering team at groundcover, building a modern, cloud-native observability platform that’s redefining how teams monitor and troubleshoot applications in Kubernetes environments. Our engineering efforts focus o”r/devops
Traceloop vs Groundcover: common questions
Which is better, Traceloop or Groundcover?
On our 0-100 score Groundcover rates higher (64/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 23 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Traceloop and Groundcover compare on the numbers?
Groundcover leads on our overall score (64/100 against 55/100), agent readiness (52/100 against 37/100), headcount (129 against 10), funding raised ($155M against $6.1M), LinkedIn following (9,827 against 973).
What do real users say about Traceloop and Groundcover?
Groundcover: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 1 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/devops.
Read the full Traceloop review and pricing or the Groundcover review and pricing. You can also browse other Traceloop alternatives we track.