Elasticsearch vs Hyperspace
Elasticsearch vs Hyperspace, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Elasticsearch is on 85/100 and Hyperspace on 52/100.
Where each one leads
Elasticsearch
- our overall score: 85/100 against 52/100
- agent readiness: 38/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 90/100 against 10/100
- headcount: 5,066 against 50
- funding raised: $104M against $9.5M
- LinkedIn following: 533,425 against 2,619
Hyperspace
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Elasticsearch | Hyperspace |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Open-source search and analytics engine for data exploration and real-time insights. | Elasticsearch-compatible search database offering 10x speed and 3x cost savings. |
| Category | Search Engine, Data Analytics, Log Management, Observability | Acceleration, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Database |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2012 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | Amsterdam, Netherlands | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Elasticsearch | Hyperspace |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 5,066 | 50 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +45.7% |
| Total funding | $104M | $9.5M |
| Latest round | Series C | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 533,425 | 2,619 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Elasticsearch | Hyperspace |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 85/100 | 52/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 52/100 |
| Team | Not published | 30/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | Not published | 37/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (38/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 90/100 | 10/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Elasticsearch | Hyperspace |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Not detected |
| CMS | Ghost | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
Elasticsearch vs Hyperspace: common questions
Which is better, Elasticsearch or Hyperspace?
On our 0-100 score Elasticsearch rates higher (85/100 against 52/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Elasticsearch and Hyperspace compare on the numbers?
Elasticsearch leads on our overall score (85/100 against 52/100), agent readiness (38/100 against 21/100), domain rating (90/100 against 10/100), headcount (5,066 against 50), funding raised ($104M against $9.5M), LinkedIn following (533,425 against 2,619).
Read the full Elasticsearch review and pricing or the Hyperspace review and pricing. You can also browse other Elasticsearch alternatives we track.