Effectivate vs Lynx.MD
Effectivate vs Lynx.MD, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Effectivate is on 50/100 and Lynx.MD on 56/100.
Where each one leads
Effectivate
- headcount growth: +34.3% against +20.7%
Lynx.MD
- our overall score: 56/100 against 50/100
- agent readiness: 42/100 against 25/100
- domain rating: 28/100 against 18/100
- funding raised: $14.5M against $1.1M
- LinkedIn following: 2,431 against 1,131
At a glance
| Measure | Effectivate | Lynx.MD |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered brain training platform for adults 50+ to enhance memory and cognitive function. | Cloud platform for secure sharing and analysis of real-world health data for life sciences. |
| Category | Healthcare, Neurology, Analytics, Big Data | Healthcare, AIOps, Analytics, AI Enablers |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C, B2B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2018 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Not published | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Effectivate | Lynx.MD |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 35 | 35 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +34.3% | +20.7% |
| Total funding | $1.1M | $14.5M |
| Latest round | Pre-Seed | Seed |
| Valuation | Not published | $20.0M |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,131 | 2,431 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Effectivate | Lynx.MD |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 50/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 46/100 | 51/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 52/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (25/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 18/100 | 28/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Effectivate | Lynx.MD |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4 |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Effectivate vs Lynx.MD: common questions
Which is better, Effectivate or Lynx.MD?
On our 0-100 score Lynx.MD rates higher (56/100 against 50/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Effectivate and Lynx.MD compare on the numbers?
Effectivate leads on headcount growth (+34.3% against +20.7%). Lynx.MD leads on our overall score (56/100 against 50/100), agent readiness (42/100 against 25/100), domain rating (28/100 against 18/100), funding raised ($14.5M against $1.1M), LinkedIn following (2,431 against 1,131).
Read the full Effectivate review and pricing or the Lynx.MD review and pricing. You can also browse other Effectivate alternatives we track.