Effectivate vs Firefly Neuroscience
Effectivate vs Firefly Neuroscience, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Effectivate is on 50/100 and Firefly Neuroscience on 56/100.
Where each one leads
Effectivate
- headcount: 35 against 25
- headcount growth: +34.3% against -3.3%
Firefly Neuroscience
- our overall score: 56/100 against 50/100
- agent readiness: 49/100 against 25/100
- domain rating: 38/100 against 18/100
- funding raised: $45.4M against $1.1M
- LinkedIn following: 8,237 against 1,131
At a glance
| Measure | Effectivate | Firefly Neuroscience |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered brain training platform for adults 50+ to enhance memory and cognitive function. | Firefly Neuroscience provides objective brain function assessments for mental illness using FDA-cleared Brain Network Analytics (BNA™) technology. |
| Category | Healthcare, Neurology, Analytics, Big Data | Healthcare, Neurology, Mental Health, Brain EEG Injury |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C, B2B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software, Hardware |
| Founded | 2018 | 2006 |
| Headquarters | Not published | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Effectivate | Firefly Neuroscience |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 35 | 25 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +34.3% | -3.3% |
| Total funding | $1.1M | $45.4M |
| Latest round | Pre-Seed | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,131 | 8,237 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Effectivate | Firefly Neuroscience |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 50/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 46/100 | 52/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 50/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 25/100 |
| Quality | 52/100 | 62/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (25/100) | D (49/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 18/100 | 38/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Effectivate | Firefly Neuroscience |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | AWS |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Effectivate vs Firefly Neuroscience: common questions
Which is better, Effectivate or Firefly Neuroscience?
On our 0-100 score Firefly Neuroscience rates higher (56/100 against 50/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Effectivate and Firefly Neuroscience compare on the numbers?
Effectivate leads on headcount (35 against 25), headcount growth (+34.3% against -3.3%). Firefly Neuroscience leads on our overall score (56/100 against 50/100), agent readiness (49/100 against 25/100), domain rating (38/100 against 18/100), funding raised ($45.4M against $1.1M), LinkedIn following (8,237 against 1,131).
Read the full Effectivate review and pricing or the Firefly Neuroscience review and pricing. You can also browse other Effectivate alternatives we track.

