e-peas vs Wiliot
e-peas vs Wiliot, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: e-peas is on 55/100 and Wiliot on 69/100.
Where each one leads
e-peas
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Wiliot
- our overall score: 69/100 against 55/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 59/100 against 51/100
- headcount: 265 against 49
- funding raised: $344M against $19.2M
- LinkedIn following: 16,525 against 6,964
At a glance
| Measure | e-peas | Wiliot |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Ultra-low-power energy harvesting and power management solutions for autonomous electronics. | Wiliot provides self-powered IoT Pixels that bring connectivity and intelligence to everyday products. |
| Category | Semiconductors, Internet of Things (IoT), Energy Harvesting, Power Management | IoT, Energy, Radio Frequency, Semiconductor |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware, Software |
| Founded | 2014 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | e-peas | Wiliot |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 49 | 265 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +15.4% |
| Total funding | $19.2M | $344M |
| Latest round | Growth | Strategic Investment |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 6,964 | 16,525 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | e-peas | Wiliot |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 69/100 |
| Traction | 53/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 38/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 51/100 | 59/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | e-peas | Wiliot |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
e-peas vs Wiliot: common questions
Which is better, e-peas or Wiliot?
On our 0-100 score Wiliot rates higher (69/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do e-peas and Wiliot compare on the numbers?
Wiliot leads on our overall score (69/100 against 55/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 21/100), domain rating (59/100 against 51/100), headcount (265 against 49), funding raised ($344M against $19.2M), LinkedIn following (16,525 against 6,964).
Read the full e-peas review and pricing or the Wiliot review and pricing. You can also browse other e-peas alternatives we track.