Deputy vs Factorial
Deputy vs Factorial, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Deputy is on 63/100 and Factorial on 64/100.
Where each one leads
Deputy
- agent readiness: 69/100 against 53/100
Factorial
- headcount: 2,695 against 474
- headcount growth: +19.9% against -7.8%
- funding raised: $572M against $106M
- LinkedIn following: 156,181 against 34,217
At a glance
| Measure | Deputy | Factorial |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | All-in-one people platform for hourly work, managing scheduling, HR, and payroll. | AI-powered platform automating HR, payroll, and finance for European businesses. |
| Category | HR Tech, Workforce Management, Employee Scheduling, Payroll Software | HR Tech, SMB Software, Workflow Automation, Business Intelligence |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2008 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Sydney, Australia | Barcelona, Spain |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Deputy | Factorial |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 474 | 2,695 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -7.8% | +19.9% |
| Total funding | $106M | $572M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series D |
| Valuation | Not published | $2.5B |
| LinkedIn followers | 34,217 | 156,181 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Deputy | Factorial |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 64/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 41/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (69/100) | D (53/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 77/100 | 77/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Deputy | Factorial |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Nuxt, Tailwind CSS | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
Deputy vs Factorial: common questions
Which is better, Deputy or Factorial?
On our 0-100 score Factorial rates higher (64/100 against 63/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Deputy and Factorial compare on the numbers?
Deputy leads on agent readiness (69/100 against 53/100). Factorial leads on headcount (2,695 against 474), headcount growth (+19.9% against -7.8%), funding raised ($572M against $106M), LinkedIn following (156,181 against 34,217).
Read the full Deputy review and pricing or the Factorial review and pricing. You can also browse other Deputy alternatives we track.