Delft Circuits vs IQM
Delft Circuits vs IQM, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Delft Circuits is on 60/100 and IQM on 58/100.
Where each one leads
Delft Circuits
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
IQM
- agent readiness: 37/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 69/100 against 39/100
- funding raised: $516M against $8.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Delft Circuits | IQM |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Designs and manufactures advanced cryogenic I/O infrastructure for quantum computers. | Quantum computer hardware and software developer for various industries. |
| Category | Quantum Computing, Hardware, Cryogenics, Semiconductor Manufacturing | Quantum Computing, AI Chip, AI Hardware, Semiconductor |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 2017 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Delft, Netherlands | Espoo, Finland |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Delft Circuits | IQM |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 46 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -23.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | $8.0M | $516M |
| Latest round | Series A Extension | PIPE |
| Valuation | Not published | $2K |
| LinkedIn followers | 8,027 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Delft Circuits | IQM |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 60/100 | 58/100 |
| Traction | 52/100 | 13/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 44/100 | 2/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | F (37/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 39/100 | 69/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Delft Circuits | IQM |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
Delft Circuits vs IQM: common questions
Which is better, Delft Circuits or IQM?
On our 0-100 score Delft Circuits rates higher (60/100 against 58/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Delft Circuits and IQM compare on the numbers?
IQM leads on agent readiness (37/100 against 22/100), domain rating (69/100 against 39/100), funding raised ($516M against $8.0M).
Read the full Delft Circuits review and pricing or the IQM review and pricing. You can also browse other Delft Circuits alternatives we track.