Deep Instinct vs Pentera
Deep Instinct vs Pentera, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Deep Instinct is on 65/100 and Pentera on 68/100.
Where each one leads
Deep Instinct
- funding raised: $309M against $175M
Pentera
- headcount: 487 against 156
- headcount growth: +14.1% against -16.1%
- LinkedIn following: 93,381 against 28,772
At a glance
| Measure | Deep Instinct | Pentera |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Enterprise cybersecurity company applying deep learning for predictive threat prevention. | Automated security validation platform to continuously test and reduce cyber exposure. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Detection, Prevention | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Penetration Testing, Threat Detection |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2014 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Deep Instinct | Pentera |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 156 | 487 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -16.1% | +14.1% |
| Total funding | $309M | $175M |
| Latest round | Funding Round | Series D |
| Valuation | $223M | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 28,772 | 93,381 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Deep Instinct | Pentera |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 65/100 | 68/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 100/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 79/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 72/100 | 69/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Deep Instinct | Pentera |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Netlify | Not detected |
| CDN | Netlify | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Deep Instinct vs Pentera: common questions
Which is better, Deep Instinct or Pentera?
On our 0-100 score Pentera rates higher (68/100 against 65/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Deep Instinct and Pentera compare on the numbers?
Deep Instinct leads on funding raised ($309M against $175M). Pentera leads on headcount (487 against 156), headcount growth (+14.1% against -16.1%), LinkedIn following (93,381 against 28,772).
Read the full Deep Instinct review and pricing or the Pentera review and pricing. You can also browse other Deep Instinct alternatives we track.