Deep Instinct vs MedAware
Deep Instinct vs MedAware, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Deep Instinct is on 65/100 and MedAware on 49/100.
Where each one leads
Deep Instinct
- our overall score: 65/100 against 49/100
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 72/100 against 33/100
- headcount: 156 against 9
- headcount growth: -16.1% against -28.9%
- funding raised: $309M against $35.6M
- LinkedIn following: 28,772 against 2,143
MedAware
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Deep Instinct | MedAware |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Enterprise cybersecurity company applying deep learning for predictive threat prevention. | MedAware provides AI-driven clinical decision support to prevent medication-related errors in healthcare. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Detection, Prevention | Prevention, Healthcare, Prescription Errors, Prescription |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2014 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Deep Instinct | MedAware |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 156 | 9 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -16.1% | -28.9% |
| Total funding | $309M | $35.6M |
| Latest round | Funding Round | Series A |
| Valuation | $223M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 28,772 | 2,143 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Deep Instinct | MedAware |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 65/100 | 49/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 48/100 |
| Team | 100/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 23/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 48/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 72/100 | 33/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Deep Instinct | MedAware |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Netlify | Not detected |
| CDN | Netlify | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
Deep Instinct vs MedAware: common questions
Which is better, Deep Instinct or MedAware?
On our 0-100 score Deep Instinct rates higher (65/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Deep Instinct and MedAware compare on the numbers?
Deep Instinct leads on our overall score (65/100 against 49/100), agent readiness (46/100 against 21/100), domain rating (72/100 against 33/100), headcount (156 against 9), headcount growth (-16.1% against -28.9%), funding raised ($309M against $35.6M), LinkedIn following (28,772 against 2,143).
Read the full Deep Instinct review and pricing or the MedAware review and pricing. You can also browse other Deep Instinct alternatives we track.