Decagon vs Hear.AI
Decagon vs Hear.AI, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Decagon is on 68/100 and Hear.AI on 52/100.
Where each one leads
Decagon
- our overall score: 68/100 against 52/100
- agent readiness: 54/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 72/100 against 2/100
- headcount: 481 against 30
- funding raised: $491M against $1.0M
- LinkedIn following: 65,729 against 6,066
Hear.AI
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Decagon | Hear.AI |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered customer support platform that uses autonomous AI agents to resolve complex customer inquiries. | Enhancing human capabilities with chained LLMs for conversational intelligence. |
| Category | AI Agent, Conversational AI, Customer Service Automation, Enterprise Software | Generative AI, Conversational AI, Voice AI, Agentic AI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2023 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Decagon | Hear.AI |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 481 | 30 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +205.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | $491M | $1.0M |
| Latest round | Series D | Seed |
| Valuation | $4.5B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 65,729 | 6,066 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Decagon | Hear.AI |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 68/100 | 52/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 45/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 80/100 | 39/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (54/100) | F (22/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 72/100 | 2/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Decagon | Hear.AI |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Segment, Facebook Pixel | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | Decagon | Hear.AI |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 0 negative across 5 threads | Not published |
“Decagon just raised $250M at $4.5B. AI customer support is eating a $500B market and nobody's pricing the losers correctly.. Decagon AI autonomous customer support agents raised $250M in a Series D at a $4.5B valuation, led by Coatue and In”r/wallstreet
Decagon vs Hear.AI: common questions
Which is better, Decagon or Hear.AI?
On our 0-100 score Decagon rates higher (68/100 against 52/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Decagon and Hear.AI compare on the numbers?
Decagon leads on our overall score (68/100 against 52/100), agent readiness (54/100 against 22/100), domain rating (72/100 against 2/100), headcount (481 against 30), funding raised ($491M against $1.0M), LinkedIn following (65,729 against 6,066).
What do real users say about Decagon and Hear.AI?
Decagon: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 5 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/wallstreet.
Read the full Decagon review and pricing or the Hear.AI review and pricing. You can also browse other Decagon alternatives we track.