Decagon AI vs Omilia
Decagon AI vs Omilia, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Decagon AI is on 68/100 and Omilia on 58/100.
Where each one leads
Decagon AI
- our overall score: 68/100 against 58/100
- agent readiness: 54/100 against 36/100
- domain rating: 72/100 against 49/100
- funding raised: $250M against $87.0M
Omilia
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Decagon AI | Omilia |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI concierge platform for customer interactions. | Conversational AI for Customer Service. |
| Category | Artificial Intelligence, Customer Service, Agentic AI, Support | Conversational AI, Customer Service, Enterprise Software, Artificial Intelligence |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2023 | 2002 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Athens, Greece |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Decagon AI | Omilia |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 502 | Not published |
| Total funding | $250M | $87.0M |
| Latest round | late-stage funding | Series B |
| Valuation | $4.5B | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 67,999 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Decagon AI | Omilia |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 40/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | 20/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 24/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (54/100) | F (36/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 72/100 | 49/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Decagon AI | Omilia |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Segment, Facebook Pixel | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | HubSpot |
Decagon AI vs Omilia: common questions
Which is better, Decagon AI or Omilia?
On our 0-100 score Decagon AI rates higher (68/100 against 58/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Decagon AI and Omilia compare on the numbers?
Decagon AI leads on our overall score (68/100 against 58/100), agent readiness (54/100 against 36/100), domain rating (72/100 against 49/100), funding raised ($250M against $87.0M).
Read the full Decagon AI review and pricing or the Omilia review and pricing. You can also browse other Decagon AI alternatives we track.