Decagon AI vs Hear.AI
Decagon AI vs Hear.AI, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Decagon AI is on 68/100 and Hear.AI on 52/100.
Where each one leads
Decagon AI
- our overall score: 68/100 against 52/100
- agent readiness: 54/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 72/100 against 2/100
- headcount: 502 against 30
- funding raised: $250M against $1.0M
- LinkedIn following: 67,999 against 6,066
Hear.AI
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Decagon AI | Hear.AI |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI concierge platform for customer interactions. | Enhancing human capabilities with chained LLMs for conversational intelligence. |
| Category | Artificial Intelligence, Customer Service, Agentic AI, Support | Generative AI, Conversational AI, Voice AI, Agentic AI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2023 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Decagon AI | Hear.AI |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 502 | 30 |
| Total funding | $250M | $1.0M |
| Latest round | late-stage funding | Seed |
| Valuation | $4.5B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 67,999 | 6,066 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Decagon AI | Hear.AI |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 68/100 | 52/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 45/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 20/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 39/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (54/100) | F (22/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 72/100 | 2/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Decagon AI | Hear.AI |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Segment, Facebook Pixel | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Decagon AI vs Hear.AI: common questions
Which is better, Decagon AI or Hear.AI?
On our 0-100 score Decagon AI rates higher (68/100 against 52/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Decagon AI and Hear.AI compare on the numbers?
Decagon AI leads on our overall score (68/100 against 52/100), agent readiness (54/100 against 22/100), domain rating (72/100 against 2/100), headcount (502 against 30), funding raised ($250M against $1.0M), LinkedIn following (67,999 against 6,066).
Read the full Decagon AI review and pricing or the Hear.AI review and pricing. You can also browse other Decagon AI alternatives we track.