Databricks vs Sigma Computing
Databricks vs Sigma Computing, compared side by side on 24 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Databricks is on 82/100 and Sigma Computing on 71/100.
Where each one leads
Databricks
- our overall score: 82/100 against 71/100
- domain rating: 88/100 against 73/100
- headcount: 15,082 against 1,429
- funding raised: $37B against $220M
- LinkedIn following: 1,191,281 against 56,620
Sigma Computing
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Databricks | Sigma Computing |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A unified data analytics and AI platform built on the lakehouse architecture. | Cloud-native data analytics platform for AI applications and business intelligence. |
| Category | Data Analytics, Machine Learning, Cloud Computing, Data Platform | Analytics Platform, Business Intelligence, Data Warehousing, Cloud Data Warehouse |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2013 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Databricks | Sigma Computing |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 15,082 | 1,429 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +27.1% | Not published |
| Total funding | $37B | $220M |
| Latest round | Strategic Financing | Series E |
| Valuation | $190B | $3.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,191,281 | 56,620 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Databricks | Sigma Computing |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 82/100 | 71/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 25/100 | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 69/100 | 62/100 |
| Quality | 96/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (49/100) | D (49/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 88/100 | 73/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Databricks | Sigma Computing |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Netlify |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Netlify |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, PostHog |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
What users say
| Measure | Databricks | Sigma Computing |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | 3.5/5 from 2 votes | Not published |
Databricks vs Sigma Computing: common questions
Which is better, Databricks or Sigma Computing?
On our 0-100 score Databricks rates higher (82/100 against 71/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 24 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Databricks and Sigma Computing compare on the numbers?
Databricks leads on our overall score (82/100 against 71/100), domain rating (88/100 against 73/100), headcount (15,082 against 1,429), funding raised ($37B against $220M), LinkedIn following (1,191,281 against 56,620).
Read the full Databricks review and pricing or the Sigma Computing review and pricing. You can also browse other Databricks alternatives we track.