Cynet vs Seraphic Security
Cynet vs Seraphic Security, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cynet is on 60/100 and Seraphic Security on 55/100.
Where each one leads
Cynet
- our overall score: 60/100 against 55/100
- domain rating: 71/100 against 51/100
- headcount: 337 against 150
- funding raised: $118M against $29.0M
- LinkedIn following: 43,743 against 11,147
Seraphic Security
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Cynet | Seraphic Security |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Comprehensive cybersecurity platform for advanced threat detection, prevention, and automated response. | Secures enterprise web browsers against data leakage and cyber threats. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Endpoint Security | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Web Browser, Endpoint Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cynet | Seraphic Security |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 337 | 150 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +79.6% |
| Total funding | $118M | $29.0M |
| Latest round | Series D | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 43,743 | 11,147 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cynet | Seraphic Security |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 60/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 57/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 50/100 | 30/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 62/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 71/100 | 51/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cynet | Seraphic Security |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar | Google Tag Manager, PostHog |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Cynet vs Seraphic Security: common questions
Which is better, Cynet or Seraphic Security?
On our 0-100 score Cynet rates higher (60/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cynet and Seraphic Security compare on the numbers?
Cynet leads on our overall score (60/100 against 55/100), domain rating (71/100 against 51/100), headcount (337 against 150), funding raised ($118M against $29.0M), LinkedIn following (43,743 against 11,147).
Read the full Cynet review and pricing or the Seraphic Security review and pricing. You can also browse other Cynet alternatives we track.