Cyberbit vs Perception Point
Cyberbit vs Perception Point, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cyberbit is on 49/100 and Perception Point on 65/100.
Where each one leads
Cyberbit
- headcount: 133 against 17
- headcount growth: -12.7% against -46.3%
- LinkedIn following: 25,796 against 13,315
Perception Point
- our overall score: 65/100 against 49/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 89/100 against 59/100
- funding raised: $38.0M against $30.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Cyberbit | Perception Point |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cyberbit provides cybersecurity training and simulation solutions for organizations to prepare their teams for cyberattacks. | Prevention-as-a-Service for next-gen threat detection across email, web, and cloud apps. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Incident Response, Endpoint Security | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Incident Response, Phishing |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cyberbit | Perception Point |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 133 | 17 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -12.7% | -46.3% |
| Total funding | $30.0M | $38.0M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 25,796 | 13,315 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cyberbit | Perception Point |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 49/100 | 65/100 |
| Traction | 57/100 | 50/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 59/100 | 89/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cyberbit | Perception Point |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Not detected | CloudFront |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Cyberbit vs Perception Point: common questions
Which is better, Cyberbit or Perception Point?
On our 0-100 score Perception Point rates higher (65/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cyberbit and Perception Point compare on the numbers?
Cyberbit leads on headcount (133 against 17), headcount growth (-12.7% against -46.3%), LinkedIn following (25,796 against 13,315). Perception Point leads on our overall score (65/100 against 49/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 21/100), domain rating (89/100 against 59/100), funding raised ($38.0M against $30.0M).
Read the full Cyberbit review and pricing or the Perception Point review and pricing. You can also browse other Cyberbit alternatives we track.