Cyberbit vs Illusive Networks
Cyberbit vs Illusive Networks, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cyberbit is on 49/100 and Illusive Networks on 56/100.
Where each one leads
Cyberbit
- headcount: 133 against 70
- LinkedIn following: 25,796 against 10,813
Illusive Networks
- our overall score: 56/100 against 49/100
- funding raised: $81.0M against $30.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Cyberbit | Illusive Networks |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cyberbit provides cybersecurity training and simulation solutions for organizations to prepare their teams for cyberattacks. | Illusive Networks provides deception-based cybersecurity solutions to detect and stop advanced attacks by creating a deceptive layer across the network. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Incident Response, Endpoint Security | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Autonomous, Threat Detection |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cyberbit | Illusive Networks |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 133 | 70 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -12.7% | -15.8% |
| Total funding | $30.0M | $81.0M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series B |
| Valuation | Not published | $96.0M |
| LinkedIn followers | 25,796 | 10,813 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cyberbit | Illusive Networks |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 49/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 57/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | Not published | 40/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 62/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 59/100 | 56/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cyberbit | Illusive Networks |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Google Cloud |
What users say
| Measure | Cyberbit | Illusive Networks |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 0 positive, 0 negative across 2 threads |
“Has anyone used Illusive networks products?. Trying to figure out if it's all smoke and mirrors, or if it is actually useful.”r/sysadmin
Cyberbit vs Illusive Networks: common questions
Which is better, Cyberbit or Illusive Networks?
On our 0-100 score Illusive Networks rates higher (56/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cyberbit and Illusive Networks compare on the numbers?
Cyberbit leads on headcount (133 against 70), LinkedIn following (25,796 against 10,813). Illusive Networks leads on our overall score (56/100 against 49/100), funding raised ($81.0M against $30.0M).
What do real users say about Cyberbit and Illusive Networks?
Illusive Networks: 0 positive and 0 negative mentions across 2 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/sysadmin.
Read the full Cyberbit review and pricing or the Illusive Networks review and pricing. You can also browse other Cyberbit alternatives we track.