Cyberbit vs Forescout
Cyberbit vs Forescout, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cyberbit is on 49/100 and Forescout on 61/100.
Where each one leads
Cyberbit
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Forescout
- our overall score: 61/100 against 49/100
- domain rating: 76/100 against 59/100
- headcount: 1,341 against 133
- headcount growth: +12.4% against -12.7%
- funding raised: $123M against $30.0M
- LinkedIn following: 71,860 against 25,796
At a glance
| Measure | Cyberbit | Forescout |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cyberbit provides cybersecurity training and simulation solutions for organizations to prepare their teams for cyberattacks. | Enterprise of Things cybersecurity platform for identifying, segmenting, and enforcing compliance of connected devices. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Incident Response, Endpoint Security | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, IoT, Industrial |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2015 | 2000 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | San Jose, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cyberbit | Forescout |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 133 | 1,341 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -12.7% | +12.4% |
| Total funding | $30.0M | $123M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series F |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | 25,796 | 71,860 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cyberbit | Forescout |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 49/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 57/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 59/100 | 76/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cyberbit | Forescout |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
Cyberbit vs Forescout: common questions
Which is better, Cyberbit or Forescout?
On our 0-100 score Forescout rates higher (61/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cyberbit and Forescout compare on the numbers?
Forescout leads on our overall score (61/100 against 49/100), domain rating (76/100 against 59/100), headcount (1,341 against 133), headcount growth (+12.4% against -12.7%), funding raised ($123M against $30.0M), LinkedIn following (71,860 against 25,796).
Read the full Cyberbit review and pricing or the Forescout review and pricing. You can also browse other Cyberbit alternatives we track.