Cust2Mate vs Fabric
Cust2Mate vs Fabric, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cust2Mate is on 41/100 and Fabric on 62/100.
Where each one leads
Cust2Mate
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Fabric
- our overall score: 62/100 against 41/100
- agent readiness: 40/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 47/100 against 37/100
- headcount: 780 against 73
- LinkedIn following: 30,459 against 4,082
At a glance
| Measure | Cust2Mate | Fabric |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Smart shopping carts that automate self-checkout and enhance the in-store retail experience. | Automated fulfillment solutions for grocery, health & beauty, and Q-commerce, enabling faster, profitable, on-demand delivery. |
| Category | RetailTech, Smart Shopping Carts, Self-Checkout, Computer Vision | RetailTech, LogisticsTech, Supply Chain, Robotics |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Platform |
| Founded | 2018 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Seattle, United States |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cust2Mate | Fabric |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 73 | 780 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +16.7% |
| Total funding | Not published | $336M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series C |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | 4,082 | 30,459 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cust2Mate | Fabric |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 41/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 19/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 44/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (40/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 37/100 | 47/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cust2Mate | Fabric |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Cust2Mate vs Fabric: common questions
Which is better, Cust2Mate or Fabric?
On our 0-100 score Fabric rates higher (62/100 against 41/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cust2Mate and Fabric compare on the numbers?
Fabric leads on our overall score (62/100 against 41/100), agent readiness (40/100 against 21/100), domain rating (47/100 against 37/100), headcount (780 against 73), LinkedIn following (30,459 against 4,082).
Read the full Cust2Mate review and pricing or the Fabric review and pricing. You can also browse other Cust2Mate alternatives we track.