Cursor vs Kiro IDE
Cursor vs Kiro IDE, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cursor is on 77/100 and Kiro IDE on 44/100.
Where each one leads
Cursor
- our overall score: 77/100 against 44/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 38/100
- domain rating: 90/100 against 78/100
- LinkedIn following: 361,335 against 964
Kiro IDE
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Cursor | Kiro IDE |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | An AI-native code editor that helps developers write, understand, and manage code more efficiently. | An agentic coding environment with native spec-driven development. |
| Category | Artificial Intelligence, Developer Tools, AI Coding Assistant, Code Editor | Artificial Intelligence, Software Development, Developer Tools, Agentic AI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2022 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cursor | Kiro IDE |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,081 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +500.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | $2.9B | Not published |
| Latest round | Funding Round | Not published |
| Valuation | $50B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 361,335 | 964 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cursor | Kiro IDE |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 77/100 | 44/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 33/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 83/100 | 43/100 |
| Quality | 93/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | F (38/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 90/100 | 78/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cursor | Kiro IDE |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | AWS |
| CDN | Vercel | CloudFront |
| CMS | Ghost | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Cursor | Kiro IDE |
|---|---|---|
| Current offer | 50% off first month of Pro, Pro+, or Ultra | Not published |
Cursor vs Kiro IDE: common questions
Which is better, Cursor or Kiro IDE?
On our 0-100 score Cursor rates higher (77/100 against 44/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cursor and Kiro IDE compare on the numbers?
Cursor leads on our overall score (77/100 against 44/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 38/100), domain rating (90/100 against 78/100), LinkedIn following (361,335 against 964).
Read the full Cursor review and pricing or the Kiro IDE review and pricing. You can also browse other Cursor alternatives we track.