Culture Amp vs Mo
Culture Amp vs Mo, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Culture Amp is on 64/100 and Mo on 49/100.
Where each one leads
Culture Amp
- our overall score: 64/100 against 49/100
- domain rating: 80/100 against 50/100
- headcount: 957 against 200
- LinkedIn following: 121,545 against 3,572
Mo
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 43/100
At a glance
| Measure | Culture Amp | Mo |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Employee feedback and analytics platform for building better workplaces. | Mo is a platform that helps companies manage employee recognition, rewards, and engagement to build a positive culture. |
| Category | HR Tech, Employee Experience, People Analytics, Performance Management | HR Tech, Employee Engagement, Employee Recognition, Rewards Platform |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2011 | Not published |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | London, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Culture Amp | Mo |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 957 | 200 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +3.9% | Not published |
| Total funding | $137M | $159M |
| Latest round | Series F | Series B |
| Valuation | $1.5B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 121,545 | 3,572 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Culture Amp | Mo |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 64/100 | 49/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 46/100 | 23/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (43/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 80/100 | 50/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Culture Amp | Mo |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | AWS |
| CDN | CloudFront | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Jquery, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity |
| Support stack | HubSpot | HubSpot |
Culture Amp vs Mo: common questions
Which is better, Culture Amp or Mo?
On our 0-100 score Culture Amp rates higher (64/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Culture Amp and Mo compare on the numbers?
Culture Amp leads on our overall score (64/100 against 49/100), domain rating (80/100 against 50/100), headcount (957 against 200), LinkedIn following (121,545 against 3,572). Mo leads on agent readiness (50/100 against 43/100).
Read the full Culture Amp review and pricing or the Mo review and pricing. You can also browse other Culture Amp alternatives we track.