Crowdsense vs Zafran Security
Crowdsense vs Zafran Security, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Crowdsense is on 48/100 and Zafran Security on 64/100.
Where each one leads
Crowdsense
- agent readiness: 59/100 against 42/100
- domain rating: 90/100 against 48/100
Zafran Security
- our overall score: 64/100 against 48/100
- headcount: 192 against 9
- funding raised: $140M against $880K
- LinkedIn following: 14,087 against 498
At a glance
| Measure | Crowdsense | Zafran Security |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Generative AI platform analyzing real-time social data for trading signals. | Mobilizes existing security controls to protect organizations during critical exploitation windows with an AI-native Threat Exposure Management platform. |
| Category | Enterprise, Risk Management, Artificial Intelligence, Business Intelligence | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Risk Management, Threat Detection |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2019 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Crowdsense | Zafran Security |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 9 | 192 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +87.0% |
| Total funding | $880K | $140M |
| Latest round | Pre-Seed | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 498 | 14,087 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Crowdsense | Zafran Security |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 48/100 | 64/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 80/100 | 80/100 |
| Search visibility | 30/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 48/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (59/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 90/100 | 48/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Crowdsense | Zafran Security |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Linkedin Insight, Reddit Pixel |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot, Zendesk |
| Open source | Yes | No |
What users say
| Measure | Crowdsense | Zafran Security |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 4 positive, 0 negative across 5 threads |
“Zafran Security Secures $60 Million in Series C Funding to Enhance Cyber Defense. Zafran Security, a New York-based cybersecurity startup, has raised $60 million in a Series C funding round to boost product development and global reach.”r/pwnhub
Crowdsense vs Zafran Security: common questions
Which is better, Crowdsense or Zafran Security?
On our 0-100 score Zafran Security rates higher (64/100 against 48/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Crowdsense and Zafran Security compare on the numbers?
Crowdsense leads on agent readiness (59/100 against 42/100), domain rating (90/100 against 48/100). Zafran Security leads on our overall score (64/100 against 48/100), headcount (192 against 9), funding raised ($140M against $880K), LinkedIn following (14,087 against 498).
What do real users say about Crowdsense and Zafran Security?
Zafran Security: 4 positive and 0 negative mentions across 5 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/pwnhub.
Read the full Crowdsense review and pricing or the Zafran Security review and pricing. You can also browse other Crowdsense alternatives we track.