Criteo vs Poolhouse Technologies
Criteo vs Poolhouse Technologies, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Criteo is on 57/100 and Poolhouse Technologies on 45/100.
Where each one leads
Criteo
- our overall score: 57/100 against 45/100
- agent readiness: 55/100 against 39/100
- domain rating: 90/100 against 20/100
- headcount: 3,909 against 68
- LinkedIn following: 258,684 against 6,268
Poolhouse Technologies
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Criteo | Poolhouse Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Criteo is a global technology company enabling marketers and media owners to drive commerce outcomes through its Commerce Media Platform. | POOLHOUSE is the advertising agency trusted by the toughest campaigns and biggest causes in America. Sharp strategy. Bold creative. Proven results. |
| Category | AdTech, MarTech, RetailTech, E-commerce | AdTech, Political Advertising, Campaign Strategy, Creative Services |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Services |
| Founded | 2005 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Paris, France | Washington, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Criteo | Poolhouse Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 3,909 | 68 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -1.8% | Not published |
| Total funding | $63.4M | $55.0M |
| Latest round | Series D | Growth |
| LinkedIn followers | 258,684 | 6,268 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Criteo | Poolhouse Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 57/100 | 45/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 57/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 48/100 | 23/100 |
| Quality | 55/100 | 45/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (55/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 90/100 | 20/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Criteo | Poolhouse Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Criteo vs Poolhouse Technologies: common questions
Which is better, Criteo or Poolhouse Technologies?
On our 0-100 score Criteo rates higher (57/100 against 45/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Criteo and Poolhouse Technologies compare on the numbers?
Criteo leads on our overall score (57/100 against 45/100), agent readiness (55/100 against 39/100), domain rating (90/100 against 20/100), headcount (3,909 against 68), LinkedIn following (258,684 against 6,268).
Read the full Criteo review and pricing or the Poolhouse Technologies review and pricing. You can also browse other Criteo alternatives we track.