Creditas vs Nopan
Creditas vs Nopan, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Creditas is on 76/100 and Nopan on 52/100.
Where each one leads
Creditas
- our overall score: 76/100 against 52/100
- agent readiness: 55/100 against 44/100
- domain rating: 69/100 against 24/100
- headcount: 2,097 against 11
- funding raised: $40.0M against $7.2M
- LinkedIn following: 352,966 against 449
Nopan
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Creditas | Nopan |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Online platform for asset-backed consumer loans, offering secured credit with lower interest rates. | Performance platform for account and wallet payments, enabling digital businesses and PSPs to optimize and scale payment methods. |
| Category | Fintech, Lending, Embedded Finance, Consumer Loans | Fintech, Payments, Digital Payments, Embedded Finance |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2012 | Not published |
| Headquarters | São Paulo, Brazil | Amsterdam, Netherlands |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Creditas | Nopan |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 2,097 | 11 |
| Total funding | $40.0M | $7.2M |
| Latest round | Series B | Funding Round |
| Valuation | $4.8B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 352,966 | 449 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Creditas | Nopan |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 76/100 | 52/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 45/100 |
| Team | 36/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 100/100 | 28/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (55/100) | D (44/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 69/100 | 24/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Creditas | Nopan |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | Framer |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Segment | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | Creditas | Nopan |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 1 positive, 0 negative across 1 thread |
“To support this next phase of growth, Nopan, the performance platform for account and wallet payments, today announced that it has become a Principal Member of the European Payments Initiative (EPI), the organisation behind Wero.”r/WeroWallet
Creditas vs Nopan: common questions
Which is better, Creditas or Nopan?
On our 0-100 score Creditas rates higher (76/100 against 52/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Creditas and Nopan compare on the numbers?
Creditas leads on our overall score (76/100 against 52/100), agent readiness (55/100 against 44/100), domain rating (69/100 against 24/100), headcount (2,097 against 11), funding raised ($40.0M against $7.2M), LinkedIn following (352,966 against 449).
What do real users say about Creditas and Nopan?
Nopan: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 1 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/WeroWallet.
Read the full Creditas review and pricing or the Nopan review and pricing. You can also browse other Creditas alternatives we track.