Creditas vs Iyzico
Creditas vs Iyzico, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Creditas is on 76/100 and Iyzico on 56/100.
Where each one leads
Creditas
- our overall score: 76/100 against 56/100
- agent readiness: 55/100 against 34/100
- headcount: 2,097 against 465
- funding raised: $40.0M against $30.6M
- LinkedIn following: 352,966 against 56,813
Iyzico
- domain rating: 81/100 against 69/100
At a glance
| Measure | Creditas | Iyzico |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Online platform for asset-backed consumer loans, offering secured credit with lower interest rates. | Online payment gateway and financial services provider for businesses in Turkey and emerging markets. |
| Category | Fintech, Lending, Embedded Finance, Consumer Loans | Fintech, Payments, Digital Payments, Embedded Finance |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2012 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | São Paulo, Brazil | Istanbul, Turkey |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Creditas | Iyzico |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 2,097 | 465 |
| Total funding | $40.0M | $30.6M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series B |
| Valuation | $4.8B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 352,966 | 56,813 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Creditas | Iyzico |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 76/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 57/100 |
| Team | 36/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 100/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (55/100) | F (34/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 69/100 | 81/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Creditas | Iyzico |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Next.js, React | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Segment, Amplitude, Linkedin Insight | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Zendesk | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Creditas vs Iyzico: common questions
Which is better, Creditas or Iyzico?
On our 0-100 score Creditas rates higher (76/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Creditas and Iyzico compare on the numbers?
Creditas leads on our overall score (76/100 against 56/100), agent readiness (55/100 against 34/100), headcount (2,097 against 465), funding raised ($40.0M against $30.6M), LinkedIn following (352,966 against 56,813). Iyzico leads on domain rating (81/100 against 69/100).
Read the full Creditas review and pricing or the Iyzico review and pricing. You can also browse other Creditas alternatives we track.