Cradle vs Profluent Bio
Cradle vs Profluent Bio, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cradle is on 69/100 and Profluent Bio on 58/100.
Where each one leads
Cradle
- our overall score: 69/100 against 58/100
- agent readiness: 44/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 53/100 against 40/100
- headcount: 112 against 66
- LinkedIn following: 27,926 against 11,880
Profluent Bio
- funding raised: $150M against $102M
At a glance
| Measure | Cradle | Profluent Bio |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cradle Bio B.V. is a Dutch, Swiss biotechnology company that develops software using machine learning for protein engineering. It was founded in 2021 and is base | AI-first company designing novel, functional proteins to revolutionize biomedicine and agriculture. |
| Category | Biotech, HealthTech, AI-Driven Protein Design, Drug Discovery | Biotech, Life Science, Artificial Intelligence, Drug Discovery |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | platform | Software |
| Founded | 2021 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | Amsterdam, Netherlands | Emeryville, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cradle | Profluent Bio |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 112 | 66 |
| Open roles | Not published | 13 |
| Total funding | $102M | $150M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 27,926 | 11,880 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cradle | Profluent Bio |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 69/100 | 58/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | Not published |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 17/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 56/100 | 7/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (44/100) | F (22/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 53/100 | 40/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cradle | Profluent Bio |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Framer | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4 |
Cradle vs Profluent Bio: common questions
Which is better, Cradle or Profluent Bio?
On our 0-100 score Cradle rates higher (69/100 against 58/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cradle and Profluent Bio compare on the numbers?
Cradle leads on our overall score (69/100 against 58/100), agent readiness (44/100 against 22/100), domain rating (53/100 against 40/100), headcount (112 against 66), LinkedIn following (27,926 against 11,880). Profluent Bio leads on funding raised ($150M against $102M).
Read the full Cradle review and pricing or the Profluent Bio review and pricing. You can also browse other Cradle alternatives we track.