Cover Genius vs Qover
Cover Genius vs Qover, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cover Genius is on 67/100 and Qover on 58/100.
Where each one leads
Cover Genius
- our overall score: 67/100 against 58/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 38/100
- headcount: 589 against 151
- funding raised: $170M against $73.0M
- LinkedIn following: 34,565 against 15,800
Qover
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Cover Genius | Qover |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global insurtech for embedded protection, protecting customers of the world's largest digital companies. | Making insurance simple, transparent, and accessible across borders through technology. |
| Category | InsurTech, Embedded Finance, API Platform, Digital Payments | InsurTech, Financial Services, Embedded Finance, API Platform |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B2C | B2B2C |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2014 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Brussels, Belgium |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cover Genius | Qover |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 589 | 151 |
| Total funding | $170M | $73.0M |
| Latest round | Growth | Growth |
| Valuation | $1.9B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 34,565 | 15,800 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cover Genius | Qover |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 67/100 | 58/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 37/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | F (38/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 65/100 | 60/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cover Genius | Qover |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Cover Genius vs Qover: common questions
Which is better, Cover Genius or Qover?
On our 0-100 score Cover Genius rates higher (67/100 against 58/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cover Genius and Qover compare on the numbers?
Cover Genius leads on our overall score (67/100 against 58/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 38/100), headcount (589 against 151), funding raised ($170M against $73.0M), LinkedIn following (34,565 against 15,800).
Read the full Cover Genius review and pricing or the Qover review and pricing. You can also browse other Cover Genius alternatives we track.