Coveo vs Glean
Coveo vs Glean, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Coveo is on 66/100 and Glean on 69/100.
Where each one leads
Coveo
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Glean
- agent readiness: 57/100 against 46/100
- headcount: 1,475 against 825
- funding raised: $410M against $315M
- LinkedIn following: 130,056 against 58,925
At a glance
| Measure | Coveo | Glean |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered relevance platform for personalized digital experiences in e-commerce, service, and workplaces. | Glean is a Work AI platform that connects to all company data, enabling employees to find, create, and automate anything with AI assistants and agents. |
| Category | AI Search Engine, Generative AI, Personalization, Customer Service Software | Artificial Intelligence, Enterprise Search, Knowledge Management, Workplace AI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | platform | Not published |
| Founded | 2005 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Quebec City, Canada | Palo Alto, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Coveo | Glean |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 825 | 1,475 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +88.0% |
| Total funding | $315M | $410M |
| Latest round | Series F | Not published |
| Valuation | Not published | $2.2B |
| LinkedIn followers | 58,925 | 130,056 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Coveo | Glean |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 66/100 | 69/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 44/100 | 56/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | D (57/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 79/100 | 78/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Coveo | Glean |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Coveo | Glean |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Not published | Glean Assistant, Glean Agents, Glean Search, Glean Protect, Connectors, APIs |
Coveo vs Glean: common questions
Which is better, Coveo or Glean?
On our 0-100 score Glean rates higher (69/100 against 66/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Coveo and Glean compare on the numbers?
Glean leads on agent readiness (57/100 against 46/100), headcount (1,475 against 825), funding raised ($410M against $315M), LinkedIn following (130,056 against 58,925).
Read the full Coveo review and pricing or the Glean review and pricing. You can also browse other Coveo alternatives we track.