Cosm vs ironSource

Cosm vs ironSource, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cosm is on 47/100 and ironSource on 76/100.

Cosm logo
CosmImmersive media company blending high-resolution video, GPU-driven rendering, and venue-scale environments for shared reality experiences.
Try Cosm
ironSource logo
ironSourceUnity is a leading platform for creating and operating real-time 3D content, empowering developers across gaming, film, automotive, and architecture.
Try ironSource

Where each one leads

Cosm

  • headcount: 667 against 66

ironSource

  • our overall score: 76/100 against 47/100
  • agent readiness: 46/100 against 40/100
  • domain rating: 91/100 against 67/100
  • funding raised: $505M against $63.0M
  • LinkedIn following: 122,997 against 36,249

At a glance

MeasureCosmironSource
What it isImmersive media company blending high-resolution video, GPU-driven rendering, and venue-scale environments for shared reality experiences.Unity is a leading platform for creating and operating real-time 3D content, empowering developers across gaming, film, automotive, and architecture.
CategoryImmersive Technology, Media and Entertainment, Virtual Reality, Augmented RealityAdvertising, Marketing, Mobile, Real-Time Bidding
Sells toBusiness modelB2B2CB2B
OfferingPlatformSoftware
Founded20202011
HeadquartersLos Angeles, USASan Francisco, United States
StatusActiveActive

Size, funding and growth

MeasureCosmironSource
Employees66766
Headcount growthLast 12 monthsNot published-45.5%
Total funding$63.0M$505M
Latest roundSeries BPrivate Equity
Valuation$1.1B$1.0B
LinkedIn followers36,249122,997

StartupHub scores

Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.

MeasureCosmironSource
StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating47/10076/100
Traction59/10058/100
TeamNot published90/100
CommunityNot published8/100
Search visibility39/10039/100
Quality55/10088/100
Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the siteD (40/100)D (46/100)
Domain ratingLink authority, 0-10067/10091/100

Technology

Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.

MeasureCosmironSource
HostingAWSAzure
CDNCloudFrontNot detected
CMSNot detectedGhost
FrameworksNext.js, Tailwind CSSNext.js, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap

What users say

MeasureCosmironSource
Reddit sentimentThreads we trackNot published0 positive, 5 negative across 5 threads
ironSource
Unity to sell Supersonic and shut down ironSource. Hadn't seen this mentioned anywhere here or on unity forums.
r/Unity3D

Cosm vs ironSource: common questions

Which is better, Cosm or ironSource?

On our 0-100 score ironSource rates higher (76/100 against 47/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.

How do Cosm and ironSource compare on the numbers?

Cosm leads on headcount (667 against 66). ironSource leads on our overall score (76/100 against 47/100), agent readiness (46/100 against 40/100), domain rating (91/100 against 67/100), funding raised ($505M against $63.0M), LinkedIn following (122,997 against 36,249).

What do real users say about Cosm and ironSource?

ironSource: 0 positive and 5 negative mentions across 5 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/Unity3D.

Read the full Cosm review and pricing or the ironSource review and pricing. You can also browse other Cosm alternatives we track.